By David Baker
Posted Thursday August 23, 2012
Twenty five days after a lawsuit in which Samaritan Hospital was accused of repeatedly granting staff privileges to a doctor who it knew or should have known was unfit to practice was settled, legal papers in the case have not been filed.
Among those papers are decisions on motions submitted in the weeks prior to the start of the trial that would have affected how the trial would proceed and what evidence could be presented to the jury.
In the case, Susan Stalker of Waterford alleged that gynecologist Akiva Abraham left her disfigured when he performed an unnecessary and unauthorized surgery in 2004. It was settled on July 30, the first day of trial.
A rule of the court require that these decisions and other papers be filed in the office of the county clerk. However, that rule imposes no time by which the papers have to be made public.
Lawyers for both the plaintiff and the hospital have evidently wanted to keep this case out of public view and the area’s newspapers have cooperated, not once mentioning the lawsuit in the six years since it was filed – even as they ran more than a dozen stories about Abraham’s other legal problems.
Stalker’s claim was first reported in February of this year on this blog’s sister web page, www.capitaldistricthealthclaims.com.
The newspapers – which continue to receive a significant amount of advertising revenue from the area’s medical providers – have ignored dozens of malpractice lawsuits against those advertisers since 1998.
Reports of many of those cases appear on this page, and later this year a major campaign will be launched to bring them and the newspapers' silence to the attention of residents of the Capital Region.